- Texas Ethics Commission lobbyist registration
- Before communicating with a Texas legislator or state officer to influence legislation or administrative action for pay, a person must register with the Texas Ethics Commission. Registration is triggered by crossing either a compensation-and-reimbursement threshold or an expenditure threshold set by TEC rule and adjusted over time; the current figures should always be read off the TEC's own filing guides rather than quoted from memory.
- Lobby activity report
- The periodic report a registered Texas lobbyist files listing the subject matter lobbied, the clients represented and the categories of expenditure made. Filed monthly by most registrants, annually by some, and public on the TEC website — which is why competitors and reporters can see a firm's entire client list.
- Expenditure reporting categories
- Texas lobby expenditures are reported by defined category — transportation and lodging, food and beverage, entertainment, gifts, awards and mementos, and broadcast or print advertising — with detailed itemization required above thresholds set by rule.
- Food-and-beverage disclosure
- Meals and drinks provided to legislators and staff are a reportable lobby expenditure, and above a threshold the individual beneficiary must be named. The rule is the source of most published 'who wined and dined whom' reporting, and of most inadvertent compliance failures.
- Revolving door / cooling-off period
- Restrictions on how soon a former official may lobby their old branch, chamber or agency. Texas and federal law both impose waiting periods on certain former officeholders and senior staff, and the practice draws steady public criticism even where it is fully legal.
- Gift restrictions
- Rules limiting what a lobbyist or principal may give an official — Texas bars gifts of cash or negotiable instruments outright and constrains other benefits, layered on top of the bribery and honorarium provisions of the Penal Code. Compliance is per-jurisdiction and per-official, never one blanket rule.
- Contingent-fee lobbying prohibition
- Texas prohibits compensating a lobbyist contingent on the passage or defeat of legislation or on an administrative outcome. It is why engagements are structured as retainers or fixed-fee projects, and why no reputable firm sells 'no result, no fee'.
- Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA)
- The 1995 federal statute, amended by the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007, that defines a federal lobbyist, requires registration through the Senate and House disclosure offices, and mandates quarterly reporting of issues, agencies contacted and income or expenses.
- 20% time threshold
- Under the LDA a person is a 'lobbyist' only if they make more than one lobbying contact and spend at least 20% of their time for a given client on lobbying activities over a quarter. The test is the reason many senior advisors are genuinely unregistered — and the reason critics call the line too easy to sit just under.
- LD-1 and LD-2 filings
- LD-1 is the federal lobbying registration for a new client relationship, due within 45 days of the triggering contact or agreement. LD-2 is the quarterly activity report listing issues lobbied, chambers and agencies contacted, individual lobbyists and income or expenses. LD-203 adds semiannual certification and political contribution reporting.
- FARA registration
- The Foreign Agents Registration Act requires agents acting in a political or quasi-political capacity for a foreign principal — governments, parties, or foreign companies in some circumstances — to register with the Department of Justice and disclose activities, receipts and disbursements. Its exemptions and their interaction with the LDA are among the most consequential judgment calls in the field.
- 501(c)(3) lobbying limits and the 501(h) election
- A public charity may lobby but not as a substantial part of its activities. Under the default 'substantial part test' that limit is judged on facts and circumstances; by filing Form 5768 to make the 501(h) election an organization instead gets defined expenditure ceilings scaled to its budget, with separate lower caps on grassroots lobbying — usually far safer and easier to administer.
- 501(c)(4) advocacy latitude
- A social welfare organization may lobby without limit as long as lobbying furthers its exempt purpose, and may engage in some political campaign activity provided it is not the primary activity. Contributions are not tax-deductible, which is the trade for the freedom.
- PAC formation and contribution limits
- A political action committee is a separate registered entity that raises and spends money on candidates. Federal PACs face hard per-candidate and per-committee dollar limits with FEC reporting; Texas imposes no general dollar cap on contributions to most state candidates but does impose registration, reporting, blackout-period and source restrictions.
- General-purpose vs specific-purpose PAC (Texas)
- A general-purpose committee supports or opposes multiple candidates, measures or parties and files continuously; a specific-purpose committee is formed for a named candidate, officeholder or single measure. The choice determines the filing schedule, the treasurer obligations and the permitted uses of funds.
- Corporate contribution prohibition
- Corporations and labor unions may not contribute general treasury funds to candidates in federal elections or, in Texas, to most state candidates and general-purpose committees. They may pay the administrative costs of a connected PAC funded by individual contributions, and may contribute to measure campaigns in Texas — a distinction that trips up new in-house programs.
- Independent expenditure
- Spending that expressly advocates the election or defeat of a candidate but is made without coordination with any campaign. Independent expenditures are not subject to contribution limits, must be reported, and any coordination converts them into an in-kind contribution — which is why firewalls are documented.
- Dark money and donor disclosure
- Shorthand for political and issue spending routed through entities that are not required to disclose donors, typically 501(c)(4)s. Reform advocates push for donor disclosure as an anti-corruption measure; opponents cite associational privacy and NAACP v. Alabama. Both positions are live in Texas legislative debate and in litigation.
- Biennial session and the 140-day calendar
- The Texas Legislature convenes in regular session only in odd-numbered years, for 140 days beginning the second Tuesday of January. Everything — filing, hearings, floor action, the budget — is compressed into that window, and a bill that misses a deadline waits two years.
- Interim charges
- Between sessions the Lieutenant Governor and Speaker assign committees topics to study, producing interim reports and hearings that shape the next session's bills. The interim is where most successful advocacy is actually done; arriving in January with a new ask is arriving late.
- Filing deadline
- The cutoff — 60 days into a Texas regular session — after which a bill may be introduced only with permission of a supermajority or by falling within the governor's emergency items. It creates a predictable filing surge and the first real triage point of the session.
- Committee referral
- After introduction and reading, the presiding officer assigns a bill to a standing committee. Which committee gets it can matter more than the text: referral shapes the hearing, the chair's priorities and whether the bill is ever set for a vote.
- Calendars Committee
- In the Texas House, the committee that decides which reported bills reach the floor and in what order. It is a scheduling gatekeeper with the practical power of a veto, and getting a bill 'set on a calendar' is a distinct advocacy objective from getting it out of committee.
- Local and Consent Calendar
- A fast-track calendar in the Texas House for noncontroversial and locally applicable bills, considered under strict time limits. Any registered opposition can knock a bill off it, so keeping a bill on the local and consent calendar means keeping every potential objector satisfied.
- Tag
- A Texas Senate procedure letting a single senator require 48 hours' written notice before a committee hearing on a bill. Late in a 140-day session, a tag can consume the time a bill needed to survive — a minority-power tool with outsized effect.
- Point of order
- An objection that a bill or proceeding violates the chamber's rules — a defective caption, an improper committee report, a missing fiscal note. Sustained late in session, a point of order can kill a bill on procedure alone, without a single vote on its merits.
- Conference committee
- A joint House-Senate panel that reconciles differing versions of the same bill. Conference reports generally cannot be amended on the floor, so the conference is often where the final substantive negotiation actually happens — including on the budget.
- Sine die
- Latin for 'without day' — the final adjournment of a legislative session. It is the hard stop the entire calendar is played against, and the reason the last two weeks look nothing like the first ten.
- Veto and line-item veto
- The Texas governor may veto an entire bill and may strike individual spending items from the appropriations bill. Because most vetoes land after sine die, the Legislature usually has no opportunity to override — making the post-session veto period a distinct advocacy phase of its own.
- Special session
- A session called by the Texas governor, limited to 30 days and to subjects the governor designates. Special sessions reopen a narrow policy window on short notice and are a recurring reason government affairs retainers run year-round rather than session-only.
- Fiscal note
- The Legislative Budget Board's estimate of a bill's cost or revenue effect on the state. A large negative fiscal note can stop a popular bill outright, which makes engaging the LBB analyst early — with real data — a core technical skill.
- Bill analysis
- The plain-language summary of a bill's purpose and section-by-section effect prepared for committee members. Many legislators and most staff read the analysis rather than the bill, so contributing accurate framing to it is quietly high-leverage.
- Testimony: for, against, on
- A witness at a Texas committee hearing registers a position of for, against, or 'on' the bill. Testifying 'on' signals resource or technical testimony without taking a side — the standard posture for agencies, and often the right one for a company that wants to shape a bill without publicly opposing its author.
- Witness registration
- Anyone appearing before a Texas legislative committee registers electronically or on a card, stating whom they represent and their position — including people who register a position without speaking. Registered-but-not-testifying counts are a cheap, visible measure of coalition depth.
- Grassroots and grasstops mobilization
- Grassroots activates volume — constituents, employees, members — through calls, emails, comment campaigns and Capitol advocacy days. Grasstops activates weight: the handful of people a specific legislator actually listens to, such as a major local employer, donor, former colleague or hometown mayor. Serious campaigns run both, and grasstops usually moves the vote.
- Coalition building
- Assembling organizations with aligned interests behind one ask, with an agreed message, a division of labor and a rule for who speaks. Broad, unexpected coalitions are persuasive precisely because they are costly to assemble.
- Third-party validator
- A credible independent voice — a researcher, a local employer, a patient group, a former regulator — who makes the case in their own words. Validators are effective because the audience discounts a paid advocate and does not discount them, which is exactly why their independence must be real and their relationships disclosed.
- Earned media strategy
- Shaping coverage rather than buying it — op-eds, editorial board meetings, reporter briefings, data releases and rapid response. In a Capitol where members read the same handful of outlets, a well-timed story can reach a target audience that no advertisement would.
- Ballot measure and referendum
- A policy question decided directly by voters — a Texas constitutional amendment, a municipal charter amendment, a bond election or a local proposition. Measure campaigns run on campaign mechanics rather than legislative mechanics, with their own petition, qualification and finance-reporting rules.
- Administrative rulemaking and comment period
- The process by which an agency implements a statute: a proposed rule is published in the Texas Register (or the Federal Register), a public comment period runs, comments must be considered and responded to, and an adopted rule is published with that response. A well-built comment record is also the foundation for any later legal challenge.
- Sunset review
- Texas abolishes most state agencies on a schedule — typically every 12 years — unless the Legislature affirmatively continues them. The Sunset Advisory Commission's staff review and the resulting sunset bill are a rare mandatory opening to change an agency's statute, and are among the most valuable calendared opportunities in Texas advocacy.
- Appropriations rider
- A provision attached to the state budget bill that directs, conditions or restricts how an appropriation may be spent. Riders can accomplish policy that would never pass as standalone legislation, which makes budget-conference advocacy a specialty in its own right.
- Procurement advocacy
- Influencing what government buys and how it specifies it — market research and pre-solicitation engagement, cooperative contract vehicles, protests, and strict rules governing contact once a solicitation is live. The compliance line here is sharper than in legislative work and the penalties are contractual as well as legal.
- Retainer vs project fee
- The two standard engagement structures. A monthly retainer buys continuous monitoring, relationships and readiness — the model for clients with ongoing exposure. A project or session fee buys a defined campaign on a defined issue. Contingent fees are prohibited, so neither structure prices on outcome.
- Government affairs vs public affairs
- Government affairs is direct engagement with officials — lobbying, regulatory advocacy, political law. Public affairs is the broader discipline that wraps policy together with communications, coalition work, grassroots and reputation management. The two have been converging for years, and most sizable firms now sell both.
- Legislative tracking
- Systematic monitoring of filed bills, amendments, committee calendars, hearing notices and agency rule postings against a client's issue profile. It is the unglamorous backbone of the service — with roughly 8,000 bills filed in a Texas regular session, missing one is the failure mode clients actually fear.